Does this stone arch look good? Or does it need something?
We are building a stone archway between kitchen and living room. We were copying a house we found with similar floorplan. Our walls will be painted gray and we'll have wood beams across ceiling- no brick.
However, we used limestone where the original house had brick and it has created a slightly different look. Not sure this looks "finished". I can't tell and we are already behind on schedule.
We are also on the fence if we like... help! I included our wall and fireplace across from it... Then pic of floorplan we are copying- same builder.
However, we used limestone where the original house had brick and it has created a slightly different look. Not sure this looks "finished". I can't tell and we are already behind on schedule.
We are also on the fence if we like... help! I included our wall and fireplace across from it... Then pic of floorplan we are copying- same builder.
| Share: |
|
More Discussions



But the masonry arch was not necessary to having a nice room in here.
And with the ceiling beams you DON'T need a beam over the masonry too. That would look eye browish and detract from the arch. You don't want to harden the line there anyway.
The ceiling is the star and the fireplace. And hopefully beautiful furniture, case goods, rugs, window treatments, later to come. Dont forget how expensive furnishings are. They add up. Especially in larger homes.
The left top stone/brick should be replaced.
What would look really great with the stone is to apply, to the un-masoned areas of that wall, a weathered gray planking.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_rn=3&gs_ri=psy-ab&pq=arched+brick+walls&cp=9&gs_id=10&xhr=t&q=interior+arched+brick+walls&rlz=1C1CHMD_enCA371CA371&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.42553238,d.aWc&biw=1517&bih=725&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=5tYjUaacI8a6yQGblIGgBA#um=1&hl=en&tbo=d&rlz=1C1CHMD_enCA371CA371&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=living+room+interior+arched+brick+walls&oq=living+room+interior+arched+brick+walls&gs_l=img.12...35255.38853.0.41544.12.12.0.0.0.0.203.1904.1j10j1.12.0...0.0...1c.1.3.img.p4a3PyuHmH8&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.42553238,d.aWc&fp=f3c0a876775ce0c9&biw=1517&bih=725&imgrc=whnhDYnGvGIXsM%3A%3B6_WuxvXcT13-sM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fjp1.r0tt.com%252Fl_10bb8340-59e7-11e1-9faa-637d54c00001.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.juxtapost.com%252Fsite%252Fpermlink%252F1187a510-59e7-11e1-808e-9b6e38646498%252Fpost%252Fbrick_wall_w_arch_will_be_between_the_living_room_and_dining_roomkitchen_%252F%3B400%3B300
I included pics of where the arches were designed to go. Keep in mind, we moved our fireplace to be straight on the wall on left and opened up the back wall with all sliding glass doors.
Again sorry,but it the stone arch looks applied and fake. Keep it simple and use architectural items as they were intended. best! I am sure it will work out fine.
Steve
I am glad a GC [who is qualified to address the problem] said it. It needed to be said.
No sense throwing good money after bad.
http://www.houzz.com/discussions/324865/Arches-or-no-arches---
I think the arch brings grand character to the rooms that it opens through to. I work with contractors, like all designers, all of the time. They are, IMO, hardwired to look at construction according to the way they are taught construction should be, and tend to be purists. Which is very often an excellent quality, as they often fall into the position of constructing for someone who does not have a designer (penny wise and pound foolish, always have a designer- IMO) but they can not afford one or want to save money, and contractor's position is definitely fail safe. And, definitely will not cause harm to the subject project.
However, there is such a thing as artistic license. Designers take it all the time with great success. I will give you an example of a television program I am sure many of you have watched on HGTV called International House Hunter, I think that is the name. Anyway, you will see homes, all of the time that have old walls and parts of old walls, and interesting architectural features jutting out and it gives it a sense of charm and character. I have even seen interiors in some of the finest design magazines taking advantage of such charming elements
Your archway will bring that to your room, when, as others have said, it is finished. So, go back in time, regather your original thought, and complete your wonderful room and enjoy it. When your room is done, there will be so many other things to look at: drapes, furniture, pictures, flooring, lighting, and accessories, that every thing you worried about will go away. And, don't quiz everyone you know on do you like my arch? Because when you ask that question people will look for problems, as they start to mentally dissect it, that they never would have thought about before. i.e. my Michelangelo analogy.
I would think that a "professional interior designer" would have some small knowledge of the Sistine Chapel.
"The architects were: Pope Sixtus IV, Domenico Fontana, Baccio Pontelli, and Giovannino de Dolci.
Pope Julius II (also known as Giulio II and "Il papa terribile"), requested that Michelangelo paint the chapel ceiling.
Michelangelo was a sculptor. He referred to himself as such, and vastly preferred working with marble to almost anything else that life offered. Prior to the ceiling frescoes, the only painting he'd done was during his brief stint as a student in Ghirlandaio's workshop.
Julius, however, was adamant that Michelangelo - and no other - should paint the chapel ceiling. What Julius wanted, he usually got. "
Your analogy fails and so does your "logic".
http://arthistory.about.com/od/famous_paintings/a/sischap_ceiling.htm
Steph Foley
Actually, I graduated with a Bachelors degree in Interior Design and Honors in Art History, and neither I nor anyone here needed your cut and paste history of the Sistine Chapel as that was not the point being made.
This is a wonderful forum. People come here with dilemmas. And, I love anything, anyone has to say, if it is on point and not with the intention of just being personal. I learn a lot from the professionals and the non- professionals alike.
The contractor has a legitimate viewpoint, and it was HIS personal viewpoint. In my opinion, when it comes to questions of construction, we generally defer to them, and when it comes to questions solving aesthetics they defer to us. Of course this is not an absolute, but that is how we function, generally, in the whole scheme of things. But, again, as Designers generally are not the builders, they are ones that solve the aesthetics. And the problem this person was dealing with is one of of aesthetics.
And, as the comments show, there are many here trying to help her keep her arch in a constructive manner. One among many is Jayme Hobbes. She has excellent advice all of the time. And she gave this homeowner excellent advice, in my opinion
It would be nice to keep the vitriolics out of the forum :o)
Oh course, you are embarrassed!
blah, blah, blah.....
In the "visualization" of the arch (the computer generated one) It does not have a "chip" out of it in the far left corner near your ceiling. It squares up. In "reality" it has that chunk out in that corner. and it is visually disturbing! In a perfect world (where you get your arch, and I get great proportions ... and a winning lottery ticket) all of this would be "centered" on that wall. If for reasons of electrical/plumbing it can't be, and you still want the arch (with the brick) could you live with a smaller opening and drag the whole thing at least a foot to the right? I don't think any kind of trim will ever make it "square up," it needs to move to the right. The more trim you pile on, the more it will feel "squished" in there.
Everyone's comments have been very helpful and I read them all.
Serra Design... we did consider building the wall out so it would be "flush" but builder felt like that would take away the 1 foot extra we built into the room and make it seem smaller.. plus, she was a bit afraid that it would look like a "veneer" instead of actual rock.. i don't agree with that. We can always frame that wall out if we decide to, although the dust doing it at the end, woudl be a nightmare.
Anyhow... all the comments are really helpful and we are still in discussion on what to do. Now I promise, I will send completed pics at different stages on the whole house... so I can get commnents of other rooms.
But all along, what I needed was Lessismore's computer skills. I'm sure it's a simple program available.. but not one person in our builder process suggested or provided any of that and I feel like I'm paying 50 people for every step of this project!
You previously stated that:
"It's not just painters though--- our interior decorator doesn't like it either. She wasn't crazy about it from the beginning."
What does your interior decorator think now?
You are paying her for her expert, experienced opinion.
Rather than "standard" or "usual", I should have said most commonly used when architects and designers choose stone to be used in interior arches.
"At some point the owner felt convinced by a designer and/or a builder that this would look great in her home. I believe that was the builder/designers true opinion, and probably is still now."
We can not assume this.
To be factually accurate and for the record, the owner previously stated that:
"It's not just painters though--- our interior decorator doesn't like it either. She wasn't crazy about it from the beginning."
My take away from this is two-fold:
1.] there is an inherent danger in attempting to recreate a specific design in different materials and expecting to achieve a similar effect;
2. ] although architects, builders, and interior designers have different functions, they must work as a team
to produce the home desired by the client. A disagreement should act as a red flag, indicating that more
consideration is needed.
Because the archway is to the left of center, it will need balance on the right side. Perhaps a bookshelf or an area framed with same wood as beams with a set of cabinets below ( wet bar ?) and add large framed object inside that framed area with proper spot lighting. The arch will work with the future ceiling beams you mentioned. Framing to blend will complete the connection.
Although it's rough sketch you can get a sense of the balance with wood added. Hope this helps.
Good eye ironwood. my guess you know where I'm going here.
IMO the stone extends up too high.
It should end just below the "ceiling line" as does the "inspiration" design.
The arch - as it stands right now is the only curved item in the room - that's because the room is empty !!
When the room is finished and you have furnished it you will wonder why you worried about it !!
I would not cap or put a soldier row across the top since that would draw attention away from the cube. Also, use stone face floor in that cube. Also, I don't think that balancing the wall is the solution. The solution is creating a space within a space, a cube that gives the eye a cohesive reason for the stone to be there.
Any bookcases, balancing, paint issues are secondary and come later to the construction at this point. Once this is solved, the interior decorators can do their magic.
"Anyhow... all the comments are really helpful and we are still in discussion on what to do. Now I promise, I will send completed pics at different stages on the whole house... so I can get commnents of other rooms."
Will update with pics... Right now house is full of paint fumes. Thx again for all the help and I will update.
LOL